Back pain is a universal experience, affecting people of all ages, backgrounds, and lifestyles. It’s one of those unwelcome guests that can linger longer than we’d like, often accompanied by a cloud of misinformation and old-school beliefs. From the notion that bed rest is the ultimate remedy to the fear-inducing idea that surgery is the only solution, myths about back pain have persisted through generations, leading to confusion and ineffective treatments.
But fear not! In this enlightening journey, we’re setting out to unravel these age-old myths and shed light on the truth behind back pain. Armed with the latest scientific research, we’ll debunk six of the most pervasive misconceptions surrounding back pain, empowering you with knowledge to make informed decisions about your spinal health.
Join us as we delve into the fascinating world of back pain myths and discover the real facts backed by science. From the role of bed rest in recovery to the truth about lifting heavy objects, prepare to challenge your preconceptions and embark on a journey towards a deeper understanding of back pain and its management. Let’s navigate through the maze of myths and emerge on the other side with clarity, confidence, and a newfound appreciation for evidence-based approaches to back pain.
Myth 1: Bed Rest is the Best Treatment for Back Pain: Historically, bed rest was often recommended as the go-to treatment for back pain. However, research has shown that prolonged bed rest can actually exacerbate symptoms and delay recovery. A study published in the journal Spine demonstrated that patients who remained active and engaged in light activities experienced faster relief and improved functional outcomes compared to those who rested excessively. Movement helps maintain flexibility, strengthens muscles, and promotes healing, making it a crucial component of back pain management.
Myth 2: Surgery is the Only Solution for Back Pain: Another prevalent myth is the belief that surgery is the sole remedy for severe or chronic back pain. While surgery can be effective for certain spinal conditions, it is not always necessary or appropriate for every case of back pain. Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared surgical and non-surgical treatments for chronic low back pain and found that surgical interventions were not superior to conservative approaches in terms of pain reduction and functional improvement. Non-surgical options such as physotherapy, exercise, and medication can often yield comparable outcomes without the risks associated with surgery.
Myth 3: Back Pain Indicates a Serious Structural Problem: Many people assume that back pain is always indicative of a severe injury or structural abnormality in the spine. While conditions like herniated discs or spinal fractures can indeed cause back pain, the majority of cases are due to muscular strain or joint pathology. Research published in Pain Medicine revealed that only a small percentage of patients with acute low back pain had identifiable structural causes for their symptoms. Most episodes of back pain resolve on their own within a few weeks with conservative treatment, underscoring the importance of addressing muscular issues and joint stiffness, rather than solely focusing on permanent structural abnormalities.
Myth 4: Lifting Heavy Objects is the Primary Cause of Back Pain: Another common misconception is that lifting heavy objects is the primary cause of back pain. While improper lifting techniques can contribute to back strain, research suggests that other factors play more significant roles. A study in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that occupational factors like heavy lifting accounted for only a small proportion of back pain cases. Lifestyle factors such as obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity were more strongly associated with the development of back pain. Additionally, poor posture and lack of trunk strength can increase the risk of injury during lifting, highlighting the importance of overall fitness and proper body mechanics.
Myth 5: Aging Inevitably Leads to Back Pain: Many people believe that back pain is an unavoidable consequence of aging, resigning themselves to the idea that nothing can be done to prevent or alleviate it. However, research suggests otherwise. While age-related changes in the spine, such as degenerative disc disease or arthritis, are common, they do not always result in symptomatic back pain. A study in Spine found that age was not a significant predictor of back pain severity or disability. Instead, factors such as physical fitness, posture, and overall health played more significant roles in determining back pain outcomes. This highlights the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle and incorporating regular exercise to mitigate the effects of aging on the spine.
Myth 6: Bracing the ‘Core’ Before Lifting Prevents Back Pain: One prevalent myth in the realm of back pain prevention is the notion that bracing the ‘core’ (trunk) before lifting heavy objects can prevent injury. Excessively rigid bracing or holding the breath whilst lifting can actually increase intra-abdominal pressure and strain on the spine. Research published in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy suggests that maintaining a neutral spine position and activating the core muscles dynamically, rather than bracing excessively, is more effective in preventing back injuries during lifting. Incorporating proper lifting techniques and core strengthening exercises into routine activities can reduce the risk of back pain without resorting to rigid bracing methods.
Myth 7: Perfect upright posture at home and work will reduce the risk of back pain: Numerous studies have examined the relationship between posture and back pain, revealing intriguing insights. For example, a systematic review published in the Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation found limited evidence to support the notion that specific sitting postures significantly influence the occurrence of low back pain. Similarly, research in the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation concluded that while ergonomic interventions can improve comfort and reduce discomfort in the short term, they may not necessarily prevent musculoskeletal disorders like back pain in the long run.
Contrary to the static ideal of perfect posture, emerging evidence emphasises the importance of movement and dynamic sitting for back health. Prolonged sitting in any fixed position, even one considered “correct,” can lead to muscle fatigue, reduced blood flow, and increased pressure on spinal discs. Studies, such as those published in the European Spine Journal, highlight the benefits of frequent changes in posture and regular movement breaks in reducing the risk of back pain among office workers.
Individual Variability: Furthermore, the concept of perfect posture fails to account for the diverse anatomical variations and individual preferences among people. What may be considered an optimal sitting position for one individual could be uncomfortable or even harmful for another. Research in the Journal of Pain Research underscores the importance of personalised ergonomic interventions tailored to individual needs and preferences rather than prescribing a one-size-fits-all approach to posture.
In conclusion, these six old-school back pain myths have been debunked by scientific research, emphasising the importance of evidence-based approaches to back pain management. By dispelling these myths and promoting accurate information, healthcare providers such as those as Destiny Health empower individuals to make informed decisions about their back health, ultimately leading to better outcomes and improved quality of life.
References
- Biering-Sørensen, F. (1984). Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine, 9(2), 106-119. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198403000-00003
- Chou, R., Baisden, J., Carragee, E. J., Resnick, D. K., Shaffer, W. O., & Loeser, J. D. (2009). Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Spine Journal, 9(4), 349-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.005
- Delitto, A., George, S. Z., Van Dillen, L. R., Whitman, J. M., Sowa, G., Shekelle, P., … & Godges, J. J. (2012). Low back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(4), A1-A57. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2012.42.4.A1
- Deyo, R. A., Mirza, S. K., & Turner, J. A. (2009). Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off? Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22(1), 62-68. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080102
- Lambeek, L. C., et al. (2010). The effects of ergonomic interventions on low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-009-9224-1
- McGill, S. M., & Marshall, L. W. (2017). Kettlebell swing, snatch, and bottoms-up carry: back and hip muscle activation, motion, and low back loads. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 31(9), 2455-2462.
- Maher, C., Underwood, M., & Buchbinder, R. (2017). Non-specific low back pain. The Lancet, 389(10070), 736-747. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9
- O’Sullivan, P. B., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of a lumbar support continuous passive motion device in the prevention of low back pain during prolonged sitting. European Spine Journal, 21(3), 429-435. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2019-5
- Shrestha, N., et al. (2020). Systematic review of workplace interventions to prevent low back pain. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(7), e349-e361. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001912
- Van Niekerk, S. M., et al. (2007). The association between the postures of sitting and low back pain. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 30(4), 375-383. DOI: 10.1519JSC.00000000000018101016/j.jmpt.2007.04.007